this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
478 points (99.8% liked)

Political Memes

7609 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The implication of not applying the unknown custodian exception here is that, as of March 9, the Petitioner, detained in the United States, would not have been able to call on any habeas court. Not in Louisiana, New York, or New Jersey. And not anywhere else, either.

That is too far. Our tradition is that there is no gap in the fabric of habeas


no place, no moment, where a person held in custody in the United States cannot call on a court to hear his case and decide it.

Judge Michael Farbiarz, Khalil v. Joyce, et al., April 1, 2025

[–] match@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago

in that case, they had best halt all ice deportations