this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
126 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

47600 readers
871 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you think they would be the consequence of banning and removing guns from society, you can test this theory by looking at any country which has already done this. What you find is that gun violence is extremely minimal in these countries. So turns out your worries are over nothing!

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you know who protect such society? That's right, folks with guns!

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Militaries having guns is a very different thing to the general population having guns.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

All guns should be surrendered and destroyed en masse.

Quoting the original comment directly.

This does not say the militaries can have it.