Or you could refrain from the dogmatic commit style that serves literally zero purpose because in any healthy software project nobody is ever reading the commit history like that.

[–] kaprap@leminal.space 2 points 6 days ago

it looks cool and I can get back to developing software I abandoned when I have a better commit history

[–] StripedMonkey@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

History and good explanations of what was changed and why is incredibly useful for being able to determine if something is a bug, a feature, and why something was written a particular way.

I'm not super stringent on commit style, but it absolutely helps to structure commit messages, especially in larger projects where they're being worked on piecemeal.