this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
137 points (97.9% liked)

ADHD

10881 readers
109 users here now

A casual community for people with ADHD

Values:

Acceptance, Openness, Understanding, Equality, Reciprocity.

Rules:

Encouraged:

Relevant Lemmy communities:

Autism

ADHD Memes

Bipolar Disorder

Therapy

Mental Health

Neurodivergent Life Hacks

lemmy.world/c/adhd will happily promote other ND communities as long as said communities demonstrate that they share our values.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Plural of anecdote isn’t anecdata

I love this. Thank you.

[–] mslarryhotdogs@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You shouldn't love this. It is a statement informed by a misunderstanding of epistemology and the philosophy of science.

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Can you explain what you mean? Because I think we’re reading a very different meaning into it.

I read it as clever wordplay to acknowledge that one’s anecdote is not the same as data (by putting “data” in place of “dote” in ‘anecdote’ due to the similar sound). Considering that “argument from anecdote” is literally considered a type of fallacy, highlighting that one’s own experience is not scientifically rigorous enough to be considered data seems to be in alignment with general thinking on the matter.

Then again I’ve just learned that in 2020 the OED actually published “anecdata” literally as a facetious/disparaging plural of “anecdote,” so perhaps that’s why you take issue with the quote?

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Can you explain what's wrong with it?