this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
54 points (84.6% liked)

Communism101

1431 readers
2 users here now

This is a community for those who are new to or unfamiliar with communist, socialist or simply leftist philosophy. Ask basic questions here and learn about what we stand for!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shouldn't the role be "advertised" to other people as well? Why is it following the Kim family line when that seems completely against ML thought?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you literally answered your own question lol

. It's not undemocratic to protect the candidate pool from nepotism and privilege. even if it's "just a job" you make social connections and have access to people and institutions that normal people don't.

how many regular north koreans who weren't the children of politicians are sent to foreign universities?

[–] axont@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I still think it's possible to have representatives who don't necessarily amass wealth and privilege. If the problem is that politicians are distinct from normal people to the point of having this kind of privilege to share with their family, then restrict the amount of privilege afforded to them. Make them into more normal people.

I think maybe we're coming to a problem that exists in representative states in general.

[–] zkrzsz@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Being family with the politicians in power is already a kind of privilege, people from outside will want connections with the family relatives. Smooth promotions/contracts ect.

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

yeah i guess i don't think you can really separate power and rank from privilege. at least not now or in the foreseeable future. if humanity outlives capitalism maybe they can revisit the issue.