this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
947 points (80.8% liked)

Memes

49920 readers
1032 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VasovagalSyncope@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The thing about a party that does nothing but maintain the status quo is they will never make things better.

I don't think it's healthy to feel morally superior for preventing progress.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But that is literally superior to making things worse. It's not about feeling anything, it's about outcomes.

[–] VasovagalSyncope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At some point things need to get better.

So we need a party that is interested in change instead of stagnation.

The DNC has been stagnating and rotting my whole life.

Nothing has gotten meaningfully better under their leadership.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say nothing, but yes your core argument is true. That doesn't invalidate what I said however.

[–] VasovagalSyncope@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

You shouldn't make arguments for things to not get better

That is what you are saying when you reject solutions to the problem.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'm not doing either of those things. I'm pointing out that things staying the same is preferable to them getting worse. Of course positive change is also better than stagnation. Those are both true. It's a pretty simple scale IMO, progress > stagnation > regress. I don't see where the misunderstanding is coming from; do you think I wouldn't prefer progress?