this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
729 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

11399 readers
352 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glowie@infosec.pub 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How does a theoretical case of not having insurance companies make a car non-driveable?

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It is illegal to drive without auto insurance. Technically you could do it anyway but a single accident could cost you $70,000 or $80,000 easily. Most reasonable people don't want that kind of risk.

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 6 points 2 days ago

Try adding a zero or two to that estimate. If you end up killing people without insurance your life's over, with insurance if you weren't in the wrong you're mostly fine.

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago

Try adding a zero or two to that estimate. If you end up killing people without insurance your life's over, with insurance if you weren't in the wrong you're mostly fine.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because auto-insurance is a requirement in some country.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

a legal one not a technical one

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Kind of a technical one, because if you get pulled over without insurance in my area, they will tow your car and inpound it.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 16 hours ago

With road cameras nowadays they don't even need to catch you on the road

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Getting your car impounded is a legal one? There's no technical issue with your car.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 hour ago

Yet you technically can't drive it, if it's impounded.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Yes, in my country auto-insurance is legally required in order to pay roadtax for the car, which is mandatory to operate the vehicle on public road. It's renewed yearly, and cost a lot more than roadtax. It help pay for the damage you caused, while the more expensive plan cover your own vehicle.

UK is probably the same case because we follow a lot of the colonialist law book.