this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
961 points (98.0% liked)

Facepalm

3090 readers
1264 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which is essential to capitalism.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago

Its not essential ,its just inevitable. Like most of the problems with capitalism, the problem is the inevitability of wealth consolidation that allows the purchase of power that allows further wealth consolidation that allows the purchase of greater power, round and round. Capitalism is an ouroboros, we are just in the stage where its about to finish eating itself.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Essential? No. It's ultimately just as harmful to an idealized version of the maximized productivity via competition dream. Smith and Locke both have quite a lot to say on the topic. Smith in particular makes a lot of points on how regulation is required to prevent capitalism strangling itself, which modern laissez-faire enthusiasts always conveniently "forget." This is the exactly wrong kind of artificial control by the ruling class that they did rail against.

It's what every capitalist does anyways because it's the easiest way to steal money, yes, and because every modern capitalist is trained to be that way through the ideology that has developed around an economic theory.