this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
729 points (95.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

11399 readers
349 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Japan is an extremely small and dense country with actually very little rural areas, so I'm not sure if that really answers the other person's questions.

The main island has a land area of about the 13th largest state, Utah. But Utah has about 35 people/sq mile, compared to Japan with almost 1200 people/sq mile.

America is really rural and rural areas are really far apart from each other. Growing up my nearest neighbor was about a 10 min drive down the road. And I wasn't even that rural, I went to a normal school with a normal school bus.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Once again, this is a silly argument, which this tautology makes obvious: Most Americans live where most Americans live. A full third of the U.S. land area is USFS or BLM land on which nobody lives, and the sparsely-populated areas of the rest are just that: sparsely-populated. Utah has only 3.3 million inhabitants, which is 0.9% of the national population. But even they're not rural! Most Utahns live in a handful of metro areas; the Salt Lake City region has areas with population density over 5,000 people per square mile.

The United States is overwhelmingly urban, and the number of people who live in really rural areas is basically a rounding error.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure but this comment chain is specifically talking about rural people. And none of that changes that whats considered "rural" in Japan, would barely be considered "suburbs" in the US.

Yes, the US should absolutely be investing in mass transit and inter-city rail. But using Japan or other European countries as "an example of how it should be done!" is just dismissive of the actual size of the US and shows me that you haven't thought about it any more than just "trains = good; cars = bad", and is outright disrespectful of the population that you will need to serve.

Something like 10% of the population lives in towns under 10k. That's not what I would consider "a rounding error".

[–] ZDL@mstdn.social 1 points 22 hours ago

@Lv_InSaNe_vL @SwingingTheLamp OK. Compare it to China. Larger landmass. Larger population. And larger proportion rural. Yet China has some of the best rail systems in the entire world, and even the rural people in the back end of nowhere tend not to have cars; they use bus services most times instead.

What's your point now?