this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
543 points (94.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
3786 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kerred@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Its a shame more people, especially younger people in the US, aren't more into things like primaries and other voting besides presidential elections. Makes me wonder who would break through future elections and who they would appoint as a result.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

because the system is designed to check against this! we cannot realistically outvote the cartoonishly dumb and convoluted primary system or the electoral college. after bernie got fucked over twice, how can anyone even have hope anymore? no one more progressive that pete fucking buttigeg is getting anywhere

[–] Kerred@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah Bernie losing the primary felt odd I thought more people preferred him over the rest

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I live in a red state and during that election Bernie came to our state capitol and the crowd to see him was literally three city blocks deep from the stage. I had not seen anything like that in my life, ever.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The only person Trump was scared of during that election was Sanders. He's on tape talking about it privately.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

because the system is designed to check against this!

Is it? Or is it only sustained by, let's call it, a minimal voter turnout? That is, the system works as expected by those in play so long as voter turnout remains within historical trends which appear to sit under half of all eligible voters during non-presidential election years.

If, however, people were moved to vote more between presidential elections, might that system not potentially begin to falter? Maybe it's naive, but if one really believes they've rigged the system in their favor, don't you think part of that rigging is built around downplaying the votes outside of those for president?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? “Young people” are turning out more at their age than prior generations at that age.

[–] Kerred@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Now 3 of them instead of 2!

Just kidding but it is nice to see voting percentage in the US go up