this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
291 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 58 points 2 years ago (27 children)

Unless we fully move off CO2 based transportation

Which is no problem at all in urban areas.

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (26 children)

It’s not achievable yet. Trucks are, at minimum, the last mile for transport of everything from building materials to equipment to food to medicine. EV trucks and vans are in development but battery technology isn’t quite there yet.

It would also require banning large container and cruise ships from most major ports. The former world obliterate economies. The latter would obliterate tourism industries for many major cities around the world. We’re decades away from large ships being low emission. Maersk is trialing hydrogen vessels right now to poor results.

[–] muelltonne@feddit.de 31 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Spoiler: Most Europeans don't live near major ports. You can discuss a lot about cargo ships, but the cruise industry shouldn't be at all allowed to cruise into major ports and poison the population. It's totally possible to build clean ships. We don't have to accept this!

[–] Jummit@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I guess people forget that ships originally where powered 100% by wind and manpower. Would love to see that coming back in some form, but seems like it's just not profitable enough (yet).

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Given the mass of modern ships, wind doesn’t generate enough force to manoeuvre and thrust ships anywhere close to safety and efficiency. The math just doesn’t work. It would take a 5x5km kite (extremely rough estimate) with perfect wind conditions at all times. Maersk is trialing kite thrust augmentation right now, which is projected to reduce oil consumption, but not by a large margin.

[–] Jummit@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

It's obviously not as energy-efficient as burning fossil fuels, so it's a hard sell. Honestly, I just want it to come back for the looks (and obviously the environmental health benefits).

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder whether vertical wind turbines would be powerful enough to power a ship?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)