Courtesy to Twitter user XdanielArt (date of publication: 8 June 2024)
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
1517 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
69726 readers
4698 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I keep hearing this but having never really used Photoshop myself. What are all the missing features?
I'm not a professional but there hasn't been anything that I wanted to do in GIMP that I couldn't do because of its limitations and with GIMP 3.0 having non destructive editing I have no complaints other than the sometimes janky UI.
Being told that I don't have them doesn't help me understand the issues professionals have with GIMP. I've heard a lot of hobbists say the same thing only to list a few features that GIMP already has and then give up because they don't actually care enough to try it for more than 5min.
I'm curious whether some professionals are the same. I suspect that some will and likely more won't but if nobody can give examples it feels weird to be arguing about it.
So if you are a professional I'd be curious to hear more.
But that's what makes GIMP special. There's some users who feel that Photoshop has stopped being relevant for some uses among those users. GIMP may be a decade behind but it could be swimming in what people remembered best about Photoshop before its enshittification and retains that kind of nature.
What's your opinion on Affinity (Designer/Photo)?
Affinity being prosumer puts it perfectly. If you only work on your own on smaller projects it does everything it needs to do but as soon as you work with other people professionally and have to share files? There‘s sadly no alternative for Adobe whatsoever. I am very happy with Affinity 2 but it‘s not a standard in the industry.
Personally I can not recommend using Adobe‘s AI features at the moment. I had to work on completely AI generated images for difficult customers and I assure you it was anything but pleasant. In the end it would‘ve been cheaper, faster and give far better results to use a stock image and edit it traditionally than being told to fix this and that with endless prompting.
What is the closest thing to PS in terms of features?