this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
548 points (84.9% liked)

Political Memes

5488 readers
2228 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Authoritarian leftists. Stalinists, basically. The kind of people who look at protests being crushed by tanks and say "Good, those reactionary civilian pigs deserved it!"

[–] Astronautical@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Authoritarian Leftists seems to be an oxymoron

Edit: I meant sounds like; I'm super dumb lol. Thanks for educating me on what it actually means :)

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Liberalism and authoritarianism are opposites just like progressivism and conservatism are.

For historical (and arguably nefarious) reasons Western society has largely lumped liberalism and progressivism into "Left" and authoritarianism and conservatism into "Right".

But this ignores the reality that you can have progressive authoritarians (Stalinists/Maoists), and liberal conservatives (Libertarians).

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Either you’re using a definition of “progressive” that doesn’t relate to progressivism, or we’re looking at some very different definitions of Stalinism.

Stalinism was never about improvement of human societies. One could argue that Trotskyism was at least pretending to (it’s incredibly hard to attribute real humanitarian intent to anything bolsheviks did, once you look closer at their methods), but Stalinism was unabashedly explicit about seizing control and shutting down dissent. It embraced Russian Empire’s secret police approach and was closer to early Muscovite monarchism, with a despot deciding who gets to enjoy privileges and control, than to anything progressive.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're talking about is the "authoritarian" part of the progressive authoritarian equation.

As the opposite of conservatism, progressivism is about societal advancement, elevating the average well being in the country, which on it's face Communism is explicitly about. Or are you arguing that Stalinist Communism was conservative, trying to uphold the values of the historical ruling power structures?

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Authoritarianism explicitly opposes political action, attempting to eradicate it entirely. Progressivism is rooted in it.

Conservatism is not defined by “upholding the values of the historical ruling power structures”. A dog being wet doesn’t make everything that’s wet a dog.

Stalinism in practice was extremely backwards, ironically anti-communist, and conservative with its strict vertical power structure (traditional for Russian empire) and promotion of Russian nationalism (Stalin explicitly names Russians as “elder brothers of soviet people”). Stalin’s authoritarian approach also agrees with conservatives’ preference for strict social order models. Political activism was persecuted under Stalin in the same manner - and often by the same people - it was persecuted in Russian empire.

The founding myth of the empire - “Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities and Russia is the Rus” was not only preserved, but actively maintained through any means possible. Can’t get more conservative than that.

[–] OldPain@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think the history of the 20th century proves otherwise.