this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
885 points (98.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5323 readers
344 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's a given. Else there's no need to hire a CEO.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I disagree.

AI could be CEO. That way there's no bias, malfeasance, or lack of confidence.

I don't give two fucks about shareholder's "interests." Or gambling addicts in general.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not about "you" so let's don't make it about you. You don't give two fuck but shareholder, publicly traded company or otherwise, do.