this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
337 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1851 readers
569 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 24 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The headlines said that 30% of code at Microsoft was AI now! Huge if true!

Something like MS word has like 20-50 million lines of code. MS altogether probably has like a billion lines of code. 30% of that being AI generated is infeasible given the timeframe. People just ate this shit up. AI grifting is so fucking easy.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I thought it could totally be true - that devs at MS were just churning out AI crap code like there was no tomorrow, and their leaders were cheering on their "productivity", since more code = more better, right?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

From that angle, sure. I’m more sneering at the people who saw what they wanted to see, and the people that were saying “this is good, actually!!!”

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, the "some projects" bit is applicable, as is the "machine generated" phrasing

@gsuberland pointed out elsewhere on fedi just how much of the VS-/MS- ecosystem does an absolute fucking ton of code generation

(which is entirely fine, ofc. tons of things do that and it exists for a reason. but there's a canyon in the sand between A and B)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

All compiled code is machine generated! BRB gonna clang and IPO, bye awful.systems! Have fun being poor

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No joke, you probably could make tweaks to LLVM, call it "AI", and rake in the VC funds.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

(not in the compute side, but in the lying-obstructionist hustle side)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

would I happier if I abandoned my scruples? I hope I or nobody I know finds out.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For some definition of "happiness", yes. It's increasingly clear that the only way to get ahead is with some level of scam. In fact, I'm pretty sure Millennials will not be able to retire to a reasonable level of comfort without accepting some amount of unethical behavior to get there. Not necessarily Slipp'n Jimmy levels of scam, but just stuff like participating in a basic stock market investment with a tax advantaged account.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So, basically, there’s no ethical existence in our society? That’s starting to sound like soviet talk. Ronnie Reagan will be hearing about this.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 hour ago

Don't worry, everything is fine ^Seize^ ^the^ ^means^ ^of^ ^production^

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

30% of code is standard boilerplate: setters, getters, etc that my IDE builds for me without calling it AI. It's possible the claim is true, but it's terribly misleading at best.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)
  1. Perhaps you didn’t read the linked article. Nadella didn’t claim that 30% of MS’s code was written by AI. What he said was garbled up to the eventual headline.
  2. We don’t have to play devil’s advocate for a hyped-up headline that misquotes what an AI glazer said, dawg.
  3. “Existing code generation codes can write 30%” doesn’t imply that AI possibly/plausibly wrote 30% of MS’s code. There’s no logical connection. Please dawg, I beg you, think critically about this.
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Man. If this LLM stuff sticks around, we’ll have an epidemic of early onset dementia.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

If the stories lf covid related cognitive decline are aue we are going to have a great time. Worse than lead paint.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 1 points 38 minutes ago

“Oh man, this brain fog I have sure makes it hard to think. Guess I’ll use my trusty LLM! ChatGPT says lead paint is tastier and better for your brain than COVID? Don’t mind if I do!”

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

I've been beating this drum for like 4~5y but: I don't think the tech itself is going anywhere. published, opensourced, etc etc - the bell can't be unrung, the horses have departed the stable

but

I do also argue that an extremely large amount of wind in the sails right now is because of the constellation of VC/hype//etc shit

can't put a hard number on this, but .... I kind see a very massive reduction; in scope, in competence, in relevance. so much of this shit (esp. the "but my opensource model is great!" flavour) is so fucking reliant on "oh yeah this other entity had a couple fuckpiles of cash with which to train", and once that (structurally) evaporates...