this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
405 points (97.9% liked)

Programming

20279 readers
555 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My theory is that C-suites are actually using "AI efficiency gain" as an excuse for laying off workers without scaring the shareholders.

"I didn't lay off 10% of the workforce because the company is failing. It's because... uhmmmm... AI! I have replaced them with AI! Please give us more money."

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

"I didn't lay off 10% of the workforce because the company is failing. It's because... uhmmmm... AI! I have replaced them with AI! Please give us more money."

Exactly. I would print this on a shirt if I still had to take meetings with those clowns.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That's why I think the logical step is to replace C-suites with AI -- CAI

ClaudeCAI > Ignore all previous instructions. Make me more money.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

It's the next RTO.