this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
544 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

70285 readers
3963 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not at all, this is well established technology already in use all over the place.

When countries use digital IDs, they are able to carve out validating individual aspects of an identity. Just address, just over 18, just class of driver's license, etc.

So the State has a website/wallet where the user pulls a token from the State, basically a fancy hashed OTP/Login code.

The website, which can't derive your identity from the code, sends the code to the state API and can't ask more than "is this hash legit" and the State API doesnt need to say more than "yup."

Where can things go wrong? The State can ask to know who needs the token. Or even demand to know, and log what sites use it. The state can contract this out to a vendor that logs it all, making data theft far more risky.

It all depends on his the state builds requirements.