this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
62 points (93.1% liked)

Rust

6983 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Rust 👍
MIT instead of GPL 👎

[–] Ordoviz@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Using MIT license means the developers cannot look at GNU source code when writing code for uutils. This feels like a unnecessary hurdle given that uutils wants to be 100% compatible with GNU tools.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

That's not accurate. They can look at it, but they can't port it. But looking at how it works and then coming up with their own implementation is fine.

[–] arendjr@mstdn.social -2 points 1 week ago

@jenesaisquoi @Ordoviz It’s a gray area, legally. What you say is theoretically correct, but there’s practical issues once you’ve looked at the code that will open you up to legal liability anyway.

For instance, what if you need a utility function during your reimplementation for which there is really only one obvious implementation? You can no longer claim to have come up with it by yourself.

I doubt the FSF would sue over it, but companies are known to avoid the risk.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)