this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
842 points (99.2% liked)

Games

32663 readers
699 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 217 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Existing games built on Unity will also be hit with Runtime Fees if they meet the thresholds starting January 1.

How can you have a deal in place and just say “you’re giving me more money” and think that that’s ok?

I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further. - Vader

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 115 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tech companies badly need to get their shit kicked in to stop with this "I have the right to change the terms unilaterally anytime"

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

This might actually lead to that, depending on what kind of lawsuits arise from this change. Which could mean there will be pressure from others who don't have a stake in the "unity install fee" game but do have one in the "wants to change terms at a whim" game.

Or maybe it will threaten the "by continuing to use this, you agree" clause instead and open up a path to continue using a previous license agreement if you don't like a new one.

[–] AndreasChris@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't believe that is legal. That's just absolutely ridiculous.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't imagine that it is.

If that's the case then they could simply up the charge next year to $10 to get even more money for doing absolutely nothing. And then to $20 the next year and so forth. There's no sane court anywhere in the world who would say "Yeah, that sounds reasonable!" and even the less sane ones would think that's bonkers.

[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It used to be illegal. Part of anti-trust was forcing IP owners to license their technology to everyone at a reasonable price. That means that reddit’s API price gouging would also have been illegal and tesla and apple would have had to license their FSD and OS to other hardware manufacturers. This ability to control other companies through abusive pricing and licensing lock-in is classic monopoly violation that the govt has stopped policing.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Jokes on them, I never finished a unity project.