209
submitted 9 months ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zron@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Because the secret service accidentally shot the president in the back of the head, and it’s really embarrassing to admit that.

[-] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Still the mist sensible answer.

*edit: Most. Most. Sigh.

[-] Limit@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

Like pink mist?

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Back of the head still doesn't explain his head snapping back or the fact that the wound on the back of his head is visibly larger than the one on the front, indicating that it's an exit wound. I'm not saying his own dudes definitely didn't shoot him, but without speculating as to who fired the shit there's a lot of evidence that it came from the front.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

The secret service was just starting to use AR-15 pattern rifles, chambered in .223.

You can see an agent with an AR-15 falling over when the motorcade accelerated, around the time JFK’s head exploded.

The only wound that jfk had that had bullet fragmentation was the headshot, despite the .30 caliber carcano rounds that Oswald was firing being very capable of punching straight through a head, and in fact passed cleanly through jfk’s spine and ribs without deforming or splintering.

The Autopsy report mentions how the bullet entered from the occipital lobe at the back of the skull, and fragmented, causing an exit wound by the ear.

.223 rounds commonly splinter when impacting bones, as they are fairly small and don’t maintain much momentum when they hit hard surfaces.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
209 points (93.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42521 readers
996 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS