this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
84 points (73.6% liked)

Ban PitBulls

109 readers
50 users here now

Dog bite severity varies by the breed of dog, and studies have found that pit bull–type dogs have both a high rate of reported bites and a high rate of severe injuries, compared to other non–pit bull–type dogs.

Pit bull–type dogs are extensively used in the United States for dogfighting, a practice that has continued despite being outlawed. Several nations and jurisdictions restrict the ownership of pit bull–type dogs through breed-specific legislation.

Rules:

  1. Keep it civil.

  2. No advocating for violence.

  3. The sole goal for this comm is to ban pit bulls from every jurisdiction and to treat the remaining ones with respect while every caretaker follows the required safety precautions to keep everyone safe. Dog breeds with documented health issues should also be stopped from being forcibly bred into this world.

  4. No pit bull advocate gaslighting. Though good faith debates are allowed.

Links:

Dogsbite.org is routinely slandered by the pro-pit lobby, but the site is informative and its data collection procedures are transparent and well-documented.

Pit Nutter Bingo Cliched excuses and problematic arguments pit nutters use.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Lots of dogs can pose a bite risk but pit bulls pose a rather unique mauling risk. It's not just a bite but a frenzied attack that doesn't stop until someone is dead. This is what the dogs were bred for and it's what we get almost uniquely from the breed.

It's not just because they'd big and strong... lots of breeds and big and could kill if they attacked relentlessly, but even when agitated and angry it almost never happens, except for pit bulls. They pose a unique risk for viscous attacks.