this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)

Television

777 readers
366 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Could anyone else afford to finance this? It wont get cheaper to make.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like studios and streaming services are poor

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This cost hundreds of millions, was not well received, and does not appear to be gaining a growing audience. Why would anyone want it?

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's a different question than whether anyone could afford to finance it

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought that part was implied

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Weeellll, "not well received" is more than a bit subjective, so it was kind of hard to tell from your initial comment that you personally don't think it'd be worth more seasons and not just that it'd be expensive to make but worth it if someone could cough up the money.

Tons of studios could easily afford it, and there's plenty of people who did like it – enough to get us 3 seasons anyhow

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They cancelled it because there weren’t enough viewers for the high costs though.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But what's enough in this day and age? Enough to cover costs? Enough so that the studio execs can buy 5 new yachts per year instead of just 3? I have no idea how much they were actually making off WoT

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Enough is enough to make it to next season amd cover the salary increases for the cast and crew plus make profit to invest in the next major IP.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why sink money in a failed show none really cares about?

I made it through like 2 episodes and I get that diversity is important but wtf this show wants to make me believe there’s medieval villages with all ethnicities everywhere? I hate that I hate this so much.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

That’s my point why spend hundreds of millions on a likely loser?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

... the wheel of time is a post-apocalyptic setting, not a medieval one. They have high literacy rates, printed books, and, yes, the Emond's Fielders being diverse would be accurate, since they're the remnants of a powerful kingdom that was, itself, diverse.

Here's the real issue with the show. Any change they made replaced good writing with stale or outright hurtful tropes (they made up a character just so they could fridge her in the first episode). The End of season 1 was shot by covid and a lead leaving. And they were only just recovering the story from that in season 3.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Two Rivers was not very diverse until after the Seanchan invasion at Falme.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

... them being all Two Rivers folk before then. Show me in the text where that meant they had no diversity.

The characteristics they all share in the Book is "dark of hair and eye", shorter than Rand, and without the Aiel style of tanning that Rand shows.

Guess what features the cast of Emond's field all had?