AI

4992 readers

113 users here now

Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines, unlike the natural intelligence displayed by humans and animals, which involves consciousness and emotionality. The distinction between the former and the latter categories is often revealed by the acronym chosen.

founded 4 years ago

Should there be a law mandating all AI generated content be tagged? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 18 hours ago by SpiderUnderUrBed@lemmy.zip to c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title, or at least the inverse be encouraged. This has been talked about before, but with how bad things are getting, and how realistic goods ai generated videos are getting, anything feels better than nothing, AI generated watermarks, or metadata can be removed, but thats not the point, the point is deterrence. Immediately all big tech will comply (atleast on the surface for consumer-facing products), and then we will probably see a massive decrease in malicious use of it, people will bypass it, remove watermarks, fix metadata, but the situation should be quite a bit better? I dont see many downsides/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Things only look that way when you're a Western Marxist and reject actually existing socialism around the world. China is hardly weak or disorganized.

Or do you mean AI regulation? I think it's probably best to just focus on AI being used for war and struggle against that (No Tech For Apartheid comes to mind), rather than try and tackle all AI everywhere all at once.

[–] jjmoldy@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

To be clear I am not a socialist or communist, Western or otherwise. Yes, China is ascendent on the world stage and likely will continue to be, but they have shown no willingness to aid communist movements abroad. That can change of course but it would seem to me that the CPC is more concerned with maintaining international relationships and economic agreements than fomenting the global revolution. I also somewhat doubt the party's commitment to eventually 'withering away' as Marx put it. To be fair, I know that couldn't happen unless the whole world was on board or they'd get promptly steamrolled by one adversary or another.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

China's commitment to peaceful internal development certainly means they won't help revolutionary communism abroad directly, at least for now, but they still raise the contractions. Normal people will look at their growing economy and compare it to our stagnant economy and become agitated.

And then there's BRICS destroying the reserve currency status of the US dollar and bringing about a multipolar world.

Closer to home, there's the internal decline of the US that will soon make it impossible for it to meddle in countries with socialist and anticolonial movements. Imagine a world where the US couldn't kill leaders like Sukarno or Lumumba or Allende, nor could it invade Korea or Vietnam. It will try, of course, but the age of hegemony is over.

That's the future I see, and it makes me optimistic.

Quite off topic for an AI thread, though!