this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
28 points (93.8% liked)
PC Gaming
11380 readers
320 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree that 8GB start to be tight, but I also don't like this 'woe us' image of poor struggling developers; if your game can't run decently on a monster like the 4090, you did something wrong.
I think the real problem here, for devs anyways, is that you have people that have 8gb and people that have 16gb, and everything in between, which makes optimizing much harder than they'd want unlike a stable target like a console.
The realer problem is more probably the bosses and directors etc. breathing on the devs' necks and pushing for release, not letting them cook a good system that uses well any amount of memory.