this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23042 readers
235 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
59
What is the easiest piece of theory you've read? You can post multiple in the order of easiest first to hardest last. (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by HexaSnoot@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In terms of theory, I don't consider myself well read. Theory is often really tough for me to read. Even with very easy-to-read writers like Michael Parenti, it's dense with mindblowing info. And things like the book Will to Change by Bell Hooks hits me in really raw feelings so I stopped at the first chapter. I need the easiest authors and their easiest-to-read works, or else I'm just not reading.

-Micahel Parenti: What’s a Slum? Urban Poverty and Marginality in America

-"I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision" by Michael Parenti"

-Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth

No idea how I got through "Friendly Feudalism." I read these all about 3.5 years ago before I lost the bandwidth to go further.

Edit: I tend to watch things more so I guess you can add video links after everything else too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chana@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why Socialism? The author? Albert Einstein.

But really, it actually is good and easily approachable. Liberals can read it and understand it without having to agonize over its meaning ir challenges.

[–] Monstertruckenjoyer@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's good, don't get me wrong, but it's effectively the definition of the concept of socialist memes being long winded