this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
102 points (94.7% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

807 readers
41 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats are all upset over Mamdani because he’s a Democratic Socialist? Why? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with being a Democratic Socialist. It seems like a good thing to me. I thought Democrats embraced socialism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 5 days ago

Helping people who aren't me is woke.

[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There again. What's wrong with being woke?

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Woke. Look up the definition. It means being aware, awake, tuned in to reality.

That can be unappealing to many people. Mostly ignorant, lazy, arrogant, selfish people who haven't had the need to consider the existence of well-being of any other person but themselves and MAYBE their direct family in their entire lives.

Hope that clears things up!

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Right, but that's not the general social understanding of what the word means. Trying to save "woke" from the cultural connotations it gained after becoming a word known to the mainstream is a lost cause.

[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's EXACTLY what the general understanding is. You just need to think about it for a few seconds.

Some people just don't want to or even have the ability to think and just parrot what their peers say, or they're just bigoted pieces of shit and this lets them get away with it.

Anyone complaining about "woke" is a bigot. Call them out.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

You are misunderstanding me.

Sure, perhaps that is definition used by those who adopt the term.

The problem is that the culture outside this small group has agreed that the term refers to people who are insufferable and holier-than-thou.

I know people who care about these sorts of things. They talk about social inequality. They vote for politicians who want to reform the system. They work in nonprofits to make the world a better place. They attend conferences to learn about the newest discoveries in intersectional studies.

None of them call themselves "woke", or use the word at all. Why? Well because the word and its cultural associations are cringy. They want to be seen as sensible, reasonable people who have realistic solutions to real problems - using the word "woke" would undermine this goal. It doesn't matter what the actual, literal definition of the word is - simply using it would undermine their credibility, since it would indicate a lack of social acuity. It's like someone using the term "retarded" to refer to someone with a developmental disability. Even if they use the word in a completely kind and clinically appropriate way, their general credibility is undermined because polite society has determined that it is an inappropriate word to use.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I feel like there are some seriously stupid people here who cannot understand sarcasm.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's DEI or something