this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
68 points (91.5% liked)

Hardware

2725 readers
264 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

It's stupid that this thing apparently can't record from a computer or line-in onto cassette.

It's also unclear whether it can digitize music from cassette onto a computer with high quality, and if it can't do that that would also be stupid.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Digitising skills be a given but as long as it has a high quality audio jack you can do it through that.

Recording onto cassette is different though because doesn't that need a specific writer head?

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 9 points 19 hours ago

It doesn't necessarily require a different tape head for recording, but ideally a different head is used. For recording it should have an erase head though, otherwise you're recording over what is already on the tape. Digitising tape in high quality requires a good playback mechanism that has low wow and flutter, I doubt this thing has that, most recent portable cassette players had the same bad mechanism.

load more comments (5 replies)