this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)
Libertarian News
61 readers
1 users here now
We are a libertarian sub, about libertarianism.
We do not owe you a platform to push anti-libertarian ideologies. You can comment but not post articles, because there are bad-faith posters who want to post horrible content just to get people in trouble.
Rule 0: Serial downvoters who downvote out of hate and don't interact with the community will be banned.
ππ» Rule 1: Kindly be empathetic and kind to others. Trolling and spamming will not be tolerated. Making the community a friendly & supportive place is our goal.
All of us are here for a short lifetime. Letβs have a nice time here and avoid negativity. :)
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
All of this assumes at least a possibility that the Supreme Court will rule according to law, precedent and/or the Constitution, so that there's still a possibility that it will rule in favor of the people rather than in favor of Trump and his cadre of would-be autocrats.
There is no such possibility.
The degree to which the Court hasn't yet entirely destroyed individual liberty and the rule of law is only the degree to which it considers it not yet possible or necessary. The exceptions to which the author points - opportunities for the Constitution and the rule of law to still prevail - are only gaps the Court hasn't yet closed entirely. They WILL close them.
maybe