Harry Potter

672 readers

97 users here now

Community dedicated to the world of Harry Potter.

Mostly focused on books and fan creations, movie content is accepted but should not overwhelm the community.

Discussions about JKR are allowed.

Related communities:

!jkrowling@lemmy.blahaj.zone (Harry Potter discussion not permitted)
!harrypotter@lemmy.zip (JKR discussion not permitted)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

queenie@literature.cafe

Firebolt@literature.cafe

threelonmusketeers@literature.cafe

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

[Meta] Proposal: Maximum user choice (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to c/harrypotter@literature.cafe

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Follow up to the discussion in this thread: https://literature.cafe/post/20498464

Given the variety of perspectives shared in that thread, I don't think that a single community will be able to satisfy everyone.

As such, I have come up with the following split:

!jkrowling@lemmy.blahaj.zone
!harrypotter@literature.cafe (this community)
!harrypotter@lemmy.zip

While it does fragment the userbase (always a risk with in the fediverse), it would put give individual users the maximum amount of choice for what posts they wish to see in their feed, and what topics they wish to discuss.

I am interested in hearing people's thoughts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

so keep this instance as it was originally intended and make a new rule about jkrowling posts going to their appropriate instance.

seems an easy solution that doesn't require so much spread.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

keep this instance as it was originally intended and make a new rule about jkrowling posts

The administrator of literature.cafe is not comfortable with this solution, and I wish to respect that.