this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
6 points (75.0% liked)

Privacy

3082 readers
65 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social
6
PO boxes for privacy? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 days ago by HoracyDarcy@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Using PO boxes is a more secure alternative to having packages delivered to your home. However, isn't it true that they capture a photo of each individual accessing the box and also gather fingerprints when you touch the screen?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess it works if their background check is very laissez faire.

[โ€“] foxglove@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I work for a corporate multinational conglomerate that very much is not laissez faire ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] Colloidal@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

Clearly laissez faire enough in regards to addresses. Which is cool, I wish this was more common. People have a right to privacy.