this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
18 points (95.0% liked)

Privacy

3364 readers
25 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/20989376

Where Soatok goes over why checklists are meaningless when trying to figure out if something is private or just for comparisons in general.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Very good and well thought out reply! Thanks so much!

I've been thinking about this for a very long time. The only platform that actually passes all of Soatok's tests is Simplex. But it's only briefly mentioned in the article about session

(For example: SimpleX was audited in December 2024. Don’t ask me about SimpleX, you have a goddamn report from professionals I respect right there.)

Wait no. I think only server builds are reproducible.

But there is an Android build on F-droid and F-droid does offer reproducible builds, so that's a way to get them.

A big problem, however, is that the creator of simplex is an antivaxxer, anti-DEI, anti-abortion, climate change denialist, etc. I can understand why people would be hesitant to push a platform like that, given they may also be pushing the creator's beliefs. I think it's okay to do the recommendation with a little asterisk of "please be aware that the creator of this app is crazy".