Linux

56539 readers

518 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

324

Realizing Arch isn't for me after updating broke VLC (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 6 days ago by makeitwonderful@lemmy.sdf.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

287 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it's my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won't announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that's not enough.

I've been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I've decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] makeitwonderful@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Debian is my go to for setting up a new server because of the stability and project longevity.

The excitement of features from the cutting edge gives me free energy to start new projects that I don't experience if I wait for the stable release.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The excitement of features from the cutting edge

I don't understand how Debian limits that. You can use Debian for your distribution BUT for whatever you want to be cutting edge, use whatever alternative method you want. It can be alternative package managers, e.g. am but if you want the absolute bleeding edge, go on the repository of the project, get a specific branch, build, install, use. That's absolutely no problem with even Debian stable.

I'm genuinely confused at comments implying that have a stable distribution means having outdated software.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For me, at least, that feeling is because I just like knowing my software is up to date. Only rarely do I come across an issue that is solved by a newer version, but that's just me I'm sure. I definitely see the appeal to not having to think about your desktop applications individually.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

knowing my software is up to date

Wouldn't that be solved with random notifications saying software X has been updated to version Y.Z even though it might not be true?