this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
1364 points (99.4% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1000 readers
53 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 108 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wow, so Norman is the only Republican on the committee who isn't a pedophile?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In all fairness, the others may just be pedophile conspirators.🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Could also be plausible deniability—voting for it knowing full well that it will be blocked anyway.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I don't really feel like any of them deserve the benefit of doubt.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

A couple of the others may just be pedophile conspirators. FTFY

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

It means they had the votes for a performative opposition vote and Norman was the most needing

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No. That just means his name wasn’t on the list. Maybe he didn’t need Jeffrey Epstein’s help to fuck kids.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is everyone giving Norman a hard time? He voted to release. Give the other guys shit.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

On the one hand, I completely agree, and I think I fucked that up by mentioning him by name instead of the 7 pedophiles that voted it down.

On the other hand, he's still a shitbag. If he's catching strays, fuck 'em. In this instance, he voted for some modicum of sanity. He's also the guy who pulled out his loaded .38 and put it on the table when meeting with Moms Demand Action Against Gun Violence.

There's no humanitarian medals for "guy who didn't protect pedophile rapists."

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Maybe he had his own sources and never needed Epstein. He is from South Carolina.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When ~~Mexico~~ the Republicans send ~~its~~ their people, they’re not sending their best.

...

They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us.

They’re bringing ~~drugs~~ coverups, they’re ~~bringing~~ defending crime, they’re rapists...

... and some, I assume, are good people.

See kids, rhetoric is easy!