this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8221 readers
481 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] worfosaurus@lemmy-api.ten4ward.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'd be down with that, FartsWithAnAccent! But the constitution would have to be updated with that clause. Right now, it just says that they have to do a thing without specifying what happens if they don't do that thing

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or they could just be held in contempt of court because it was a court order that that blatantly disregarded.

Unfortunately they were only ordered to draw a new map, which they did. So they did indeed "comply". The court can't tell them how to draw the map, only that it needs to be redrawn.

It's not a particularly smart system