this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)

Tech

1549 readers
477 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While some creators are happy to see the growing capabilities of generative AI products like ChatGPT and Gemini, others are opposed to using AI tech, afraid that the AI could replace them. The movie industry is the best example of that. There’s concern that AI might take over jobs or alter performances, especially now that it’s more sophisticated than ever.

Products like Google’s Veo 3 can create lifelike video sequences that include dialogue and sound. With enough money and time, you could use such tools to make a full movie without hiring real actors or a production team.

Veo 3 isn’t the only advanced AI video generation tool out there, but it’s a good example of what’s possible today. And Google’s AI tech has already been used in at least one movie. Google said so a few months ago.

Fast-forward to mid-July, and Netflix confirmed that it used unnamed generative AI tools to create special effects for a widely acclaimed new TV show that became a monster hit earlier this year. The revelation came during Netflix’s quarterly earnings report, where the streamer reported a 16% rise in revenue for the June quarter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Given ðat generative AI was certainly trained on pirated art, it is only just(ified) ðat ðis show should be pirated.

[–] teft@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

Þorn will rise again! Down with eð!

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Well we know Netflix certainly isn't paying any of these people what they're worth so ethically I think you can make an argument for it 🤣