Work Reform

9818 readers

642 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

179

An Introduction To Class Warfare For The Software Engineer (medium.com)

submitted 1 year ago by erlend_sh@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you work at one of the large tech companies that, in the last few weeks [or months], have laid off thousands of employees, you may be wondering what the hell is going on. Especially if the company you’re working for is not actually struggling economically right now. If you work for Google, say, you must be thinking, “What is it about the coming recession that makes a company that’s doing just fine institute broad layoffs for the first time in its 23-year history?”

The answer, my friend, is class warfare.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's always something about "improving performance" or "lowering overhead". The real reason is money. If the company looks like it's improving the stock value will go up and the right people will make money. An easy way to do that is fire a bunch of underperforming employees before a shareholder meeting. It doesn't hurt production too much if they're underperforming compared to the average employee and it doesn't require a large capital spending plan to improve things.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Of course 'looks like it is improving' and 'underperformed employees' tend to be abstract numbers on spreadsheets that only exist to increase short term stocks. Productions in general doesn't fall off for some time even if you fire the best employees, so anything below that will prop up the company while it coasts for a few quarters before the wealthy that know start dumping the stocks.