this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
210 points (100.0% liked)
Overseas News
650 readers
50 users here now
A place for Australians and friends to share news from the other countries. Like all communities here, we discuss topics from the Australian perspective.
If you're looking for a global /c/worldnews instead, search for the many options on federated instances.
Rules
- Follow the aussie.zone rules
- We are not a generic World News clone. News must be relevant to Australians and our region. Obvious disregard will earn an warning and then a ban if continued. (If an article isn't from an Oceanian news outlet, and it doesn’t mention Australia, then it’s probably off-topic)
- Leave seppocentrism at the door. If you don't know what that means, you're not ready to post here yet.
- Avoid editorialising headlines. Opinions go in the comments, not the post.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have a feeling this is going to be a controversial take but... Am I the only one concerned by the face that Rossman essentially doxxed this guy? I mean, the is a piece of shit, there's no question about that.
But I just kinda feel like "no doxxing" should mean "no doxxing anyone, ever" and not "no doxxing, except for the 0eople we don't like".
I think there is a difference between doxxing someone for, say, having an opinion, v.s. investigating someone who demonstrably appears to be actively defrauding people (and possibly worse in this case), it leads to an actual convict, then informing people to beware.
I think the distinction lies in an assumption you've accidentally made. No doxxing may be useful internet social community rule.
But no doxxing ever in other activities, such as where you transact and have a relationship of trust, isn't a reasonable expectation. There are times you need to know who a person is. Where people experience loss due to a poor product someone has to be answerable.
This case isn't about online trolling and social media community standards, its about contracting parties for a commercial product.
So i think thats an important distinction between this case and what you're talking about.
Who are you quoting?
FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is still doxxing.