237
submitted 9 months ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/android@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

Next thing to be killed by Google in 3, 2, 1...

[-] CanofBeanz@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

This is why for the first time in my life I ordered an iPhone. My domains being sold off to squarespace was the final straw for me.

[-] uglyduckling81@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

This is one of the weirdest statements I've ever read.

I don't like the repair policy of this company so I'm switching to Apple......

Tell me you live in a dark cave without telling me you live in a dark cave.

[-] youngalfred@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think the difference is that Apple products can be repaired, as parts are plentiful for third party repairers and apple will also repair it (for a premium).

The article is saying how no-one, not even Google, can repair a pixel watch as there were no spare parts produced.

Edit: I understand their repair policies re MacBook repair shops etc, but for a consumer being told that even the manufacturer can't do anything is a bit galling and cause for reflection on future purchases.

[-] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Thank you for helping with a drill down on that comment, instead of making fun of the commenter. You are lawful neutral. Keep up the good work.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

think the difference is that Apple products can NOT be repaired

There, fixed it for you.

I recommend that you watch Louis Rossmann on YouTube. He regularly presents how Apple prohibit repairs by third parties either by adding software locks to simple parts, prohibiting parts contractors from selling spare parts, donating to anti-repair lobbying group among many other practices.

Migrating to Apple because Google didn't repair a product is a very weird move. Both of those companies are to be blamed, but Apple much more in my instances.

[-] youngalfred@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

But the point of the article is that the watch literally can't be repaired - no first or third party can do it.

But I can get any apple watch repaired. Yes they are scummy about third party, but apple will gladly repair it for money.

I can understand the shift.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Apple does the same. Not a third party, Apple themselves will NOT repair some broken devices that have broke because of Apple's design issues. Again, I urge you to watch Louis Rosmann. He has covered many instances of these.

You should give Google a hard time because what they are doing it is shitty. But Apple is not the answer. They do the same and more. The difference is that unlike Google, Apple won't let someone else repair it either.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

You’re making a very narrow point and asking people to just watch an entire YouTube channel (and one where the subject goes on and on and on an about everything) to hopefully find proof?

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Narrow point? The argument was that Google themselves don't fix the smart watch, but Apple wouldn't do such a thing. My point is that Apple does the same. How else would you want the counter arguments to be?

I presentes you Louis Rosmann, a subject expert in the field and one of whole world's leading advocate on right to repair. His channel has investigations on thousands of right to repair violations and scams from companies. What else would you expect? You don't want trust a random commenter on the internet but you also don't want to listen to the leading advocate in this domain either? Then maybe use the search function in YouTube, Google or in ChatGPT because please don't expect the said random commenter to spend their own time curating to spoon feed you information.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

if you have a timed stamp example of the point that would be one thing. Citing an entire channel, and particularly one where he rambles on forever is a bad source.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I just came across a specific video and I remembered your comment. This whole video is good but you can start watching from 8:42 and 10:49 marks since you requested for a timestamp.

https://youtu.be/Z0DF-MOkotA?si=fvqW4_rqwnKfsuVz&t=522

And if you have 24 minutes to spare here is another video with packed full of examples.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUaJ8pDlxi8

[-] LiveLGNProsper@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean you can buy iPhone 12 parts and up from Apple directly but at the same time Apple Watches are also not repairable unless your Apple so same situation. I also went to iOS because I was tired of Google shutting down my favorite services I gave up on Google I do not have a single service with them anymore and I sold all my Google products over them killing crap.

[-] Dick@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It’s not the same situation though. Pixel watches are unrepairable even by Google.

[-] LiveLGNProsper@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That’s insane

[-] insaneduck@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I think he is talking about google’s habit of closing services rather than repairability.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

When have Apple declared they can’t repair a currently supported/sold device?

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
237 points (95.4% liked)

Android

26849 readers
132 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS