this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
52 points (78.3% liked)

Technology

34513 readers
468 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some argue that bots should be entitled to ingest any content they see, because people can.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Current science does a pretty good job of explaining the what, and sometimes the how. But it doesn't do a good job of explaining the "why", or in other words, why do we like certain experiences and dislike others?

There's also a gap in explaining how much our consciousness contributes to observable behavior. Like why do some people feel stress when others might feel excitement by the same stimuli? How much of behavior is explained by chemical processes in the brain, and how much relies on "personality"?

Some of that is closer to science, and some is closer to philosophy, but I do think science has a role to play in helping to guide philosophical thought.