this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
479 points (96.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

3026 readers
295 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jfrnz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hear what you’re saying, but don’t feel that participating in proliferating guns will make any meaningful progress towards my desire of a gun-free country.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guns have already proliferated. Most people that have them have a lot of them. Someone with 20 guns can't kill you any deader than he can with one. Just don't wait for the cops to disarm the right wingers, because they never will. If things are going where it looks like they're going, I would rather not bring a fist (or a trenchant legal argument) to a gun fight.

[–] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Buy a gun so the fascists don’t kill you” is the exact argument the fascists used to proliferate guns.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't you understand how something can be true when one person says it, but not true when someone else says it?

[–] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but I just disagree in this case. It’s the same thing. Proliferating guns is the best way to prevent them from being banned. A gun owner never wants to give up their gun.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OK, good luck with that in a country where even "genocide isn't on the ballot".

[–] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We’ll need luck… everything is fucked. But I stand by belief that we need fewer guns, not more. Even if it’s not a realistic outcome.