this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
607 points (99.0% liked)

Bluesky

1458 readers
766 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (9 children)

It drives me nuts these guys spent years saying masks restricted their oxygen or whatever and now they're in full face covering.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They don't construct arguments the same way normal thinking people do, they start with the conclusion and just make up whatever as a reason for it and hope people buy it.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

I once called out my dad for this exact behavior. He literally laughed it off, "Yeah, that sounds like me."

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

who doesn't build the reasoning after the result? isn't that how everyone does it?

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure, if you have a novel result, say from some experiment, you afterwards come up with theories to explain it. This is different from policy decisions though, where you have a situation at hand and need to come up with a way to deal with it.

In this case:

There's an epidemic, we need to contain it
-> it spreads through viruses expelled be sneezing
-> use a mask to hinder the spread

vs

People tell me to use masks, I don't like that -> I need a reason to justify not wearing a mask
-> "I can't breathe!!"

load more comments (6 replies)