Technology

59773 readers

3117 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

245

Amazon demands 30% share of ad revenue from TV networks’ apps (www.broadbandtvnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Amazon demands 30% share of ad revenue from TV networks’ apps::Australia’s free-to-air broadcasters are up in arms after Amazon demanded a 30% slice of any advertising revenue that passes through its FireTV devices. Financial Review said networks Seven, Nine, Ten and SBS had accused the parcels to showbiz company of a “cash grab” and “rent-seeking”. Amazon has set new terms of services that would require…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's some gall for a niche product. Most tvs now ship with their own OS, so Fire Stick has no leverage.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It's the other way round:

Most TVs now ship with unbelievably crappy OSes, so most people plug some kind of smart device(s) in front of them, sooner or later. Fire sticks, chromecasts, Netflix boxes on Android, etc.pp.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mmm not really so, at least in my case. The tvOS is usually only supported for a few years and once the updates stop, apps stop their support as well. We have a tv in our living room that stopped being supported after six years; it can’t download Disney+ or certain other apps natively because of it. A Fire stick is much cheaper than having to buy a new tv every so many years.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I still have my plasma TV from 2011 (hey, the thing refuses to die, OK!). When I bought it, it was a "smart tv". Now, there's no apps for the thing. But I use a fire TV stick with side-loaded extra apps and it's like having a modern smart TV.

I don't think I'd buy a TV for its smart features ever. Far better to get a TV for the picture quality and what actually matters in a TV and use devices to fill in the rest. Sure if they're there and working I'd use them perhaps. But, I know they will become obsolete too soon.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But most people just buy a Chromecast in that situation.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

eh no, most people buy whatever is sold to them. on amazon (which is quite popular) they sell you a fire tv stick

google does an absolutely terrible job of selling androidtv/chromecasts so people don't really even know what it is.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

Funny, I was going to reply that I barely even knew what Chromecast is, so you’re absolutely correct.

[–] WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm sure google will never pull the same stunt as Amazon. They're the good guys!