this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
229 points (97.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4289 readers
122 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Being able to lift / tip over / exert lots of force on big heavy things can be a big deal on a battlefield. Imagine being able to just tip over an enemy combatant's vehicle, or even potentially catching the thing by hand at 40mph to bring it to a dead stop. I think the only detail here that is relevant to "designed for combat" is the lack of armor plating or integrated weapons platforms. Armor plating would probably be required, for expense reasons - you need your suit to be at least relatively bullet resistant and suitable for more than a single combat outing. Integrated weapons are solved by just giving the guy in the suit a standard issue rifle, you don't need to bake these onto the suit.

However, I am neither a military manufacturer nor a roboticist. So everything I say should be taken with a grain of salt. But I don't see any reason why these wouldn't serve a similar purpose to other light armor vehicles. A sufficiently armored combat forklift that can sprint across the battlefield if required opens up a lot of new tactics.