this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
82 points (95.6% liked)

Space

1745 readers
151 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Is the US trying to get back to the moon again? If so, why?

I'm more entertained by China absolutely spanking the US on EV and hybrid EV cars.

[–] justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There's no higher ground than the moon, and this time whoever gets there will stay there.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have no doubt that China will get people to the moon, but stay there? Long term habitation on the moon is an unsolved problem even conceptually, let alone the part where you actually have to build it

[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

What's unsolved about the concept? It doesn't have to be self sustaining, and most of it is just engineering challenges that can be solved by throwing money at it.

load more comments (1 replies)