this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29793 readers
968 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If anything, cannabis seems like a much better (and more profitable) drug around which to build a leisurely establishment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The difference is you can't taste other people's alcohol but you can smell others' smoke

Right but you can consume cannabis in tons of different ways - cookies, cocktails, etc. Restaurants had smoking areas for decades with far worse air filtration systems.

[–] Noggindrill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

there are THC drinks where I live, always a nice option for me to have at gatherings as a non-alcohol person.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People who are going to a place to smoke typically wouldn’t mind that. Take cigar or vape lounges, for instance. Also it’s usually people who don’t smoke weed who act like the smell of weed bothers them.

[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

right but my point is if a group of friends want to go to a bar and some people don't smoke or like the smell of smoke then there is a problem, it's not like they can just opt not to smell smoke

[–] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...that's why you would only go to a place like that if everyone is down. Having them for people that want to go is fine, no one is forced to go.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds nice in theory, but in reality the result is usually that if the majority of a group smokes, the nonsmokers don't have much of a choice except for looking for new friends. That was a very common complaint when smoking in pubs and restaurants was still legal here.

[–] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Just because one person doesn't want to go to something doesn't mean they shouldn't exist. You're basically saying one person's opinion/choice outweighs an entire group. If those choices constantly put you at odds with the group it might be best to find a group that aligns with your values more. There's also nothing wrong with being friends with the people that want to go to things you don't like, just tag along when they do things you do like. You also don't have to have one set of friends, you can have multiple groups that like to do different things. I'm not pro banning things for the sake of others that can choose not to participate.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Dry vaporizers (with temperature below 200C, convection-based) don't have smoke so are a lot less offensive with smell, if not odorless particularly with access to fresh air.

Also people smelling of alcohol, particularly if they are drunk or drinking liquor, is definitely a thing. Also barfing. I wouldn't doubt bars having bad smells sometimes.

[–] dystop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Edibles might make it better. But then you'll need to give people something to do for an hour or so before it kicks in...

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You mean like eating, playing board games, and socializing?