119
submitted 9 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Krotiuz@kbin.social 67 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm one of those people that uses DLSS, because I've got a large fancy 4k monitor that is big enough that is looks like shit at lower resolutions.

DLSS is better than nothing but it's no replacement for native rendering, it introduces a heap of visual anomalies and inconsistencies, especially in games with a consistent motion (racing games look like shit with DLSS), so I tend to be having lows of 50fps on medium before I'll even think about DLSS.
I'm also pretty sure Nvidia is paying devs to have it on by default, because everytime it's patched into a game they clear all the current graphics settings to turn on DLSS, at least in my experience.

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Just play in 640x360 and squint your eyes like we used to in the CRT days.

[-] TheYang@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Or 1600x1200 when most LCDs were 1024x768.

CRTs really have gotten a bad rep, although they were great for a while still, after LCDs came on the market

[-] timo_timboo_@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

they were great for a while still, after LCDs came on the market

and they are still great, if not better. I'd take a high-end CRT over a modern LCD any day.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I really wish there was still a market for new modern CRTs I'd have loved to have seen how that technology would've matured further

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
119 points (94.7% liked)

Gaming

19167 readers
263 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS