this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
20 points (81.2% liked)

Programming

17351 readers
339 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verdare@beehaw.org -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is somewhat baffling that most interactive, consumer-facing operating systems are not real-time. I suppose that it’s a product of legacy and technical debt.

Apple did announce that they’re using an RTOS in the Vision Pro. Maybe the VR/AR space will make this more common, since the latency requirements are more stringent.

[–] TerrorBite@meow.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@verdare @lysdexic they are, but you have to be an enterprise customer.

https://ubuntu.com/blog/real-time-ubuntu-is-now-generally-available

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/iot-enterprise/soft-real-time/soft-real-time

RTOS are not going to become consumer operating systems, because there's too much value in selling it as a capability to enterprise customers (who are largely the consumers who REQUIRE a RTOS, rather than it merely being a convenience).

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

How can it be convenient for the desktop user to severely limit the amount or running processes? Desktop usage scenarios are the opposite of RT usage.