Asklemmy

50308 readers

448 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

America as Several Smaller Nations (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 days ago by obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been wondering about how well a lot of American states could function if they where fully independent states. I'm not thinking every state would be it's own country but states banding together and becoming there own countries. An example of this California, Oregon, and Washington.

I'm thinking that kind of like the Fediverse it is easier to manage and do more the people on a smaller scale.

What do others think of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Speaking as a Canadian, I don't want New England, New York, Washington and Oregon.

The eastern states are slightly less crazy, but there are a shit ton of crazy Christian gun fucking kooks in the Western states. No thank you.

We would have to do some de-arming and reeducation before taking those on.