this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
1071 points (97.8% liked)

Open Source

31292 readers
558 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I used Plex for my home media for almost a year, then it stopped playing nice for reasons I gave up on diagnosing. While looking at alternatives, I found Jellyfin which is much more responsive, IMO, and the UI is much nicer as well.

It gets relegated to playing Fraggle Rock and Bluey on repeat for my kiddo these days, but I am absolutely in love with the software.

What are some other FOSS gems that are a better experience UX/UI-wise than their proprietary counterparts?

EDIT: Autocorrect turned something into "smaller" instead of what I meant it to be when I wrote this post, and I can't remember what I meant for it to say so it got axed instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 92 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Signal. Who else is making a post quantum secure e2ee algorithm and making sure the code is open source and not duplicating the keys everywhere? Thank goodness for the kind devs on this project and for other FOSS projects everywhere!

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

The time when they essentially went closed source to implement MobileCoin in kind of a covert operation really didn't do them any favors, though.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

how do we even know something is quantum secure, like the tech isnt out yet is it?

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

Because we already know how quantum encryption works.

It's like how we proved the Halting Problem was undecideable long before the first computer was ever built.

People have been able to model quantum computers mathematically since the time normal computers were the size of buildings.

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they can say the methods of encryption are "1 way" ie unreversable, and therefore quantum resistant (the way that quantum solves equations).

[–] dukk@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Not quite, no encryption is truly irreversible (that’s the point). We’ve built quantum computers and we know how they work. We found weaknesses in the prime number generation that powers most encryption, so we’ve built around that.

[–] AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And everyone who uses it should give it a thought whether they can afford to support the devs, signal devs will appreciate it!

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you count all signal protocol messengers like session too?

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Session is definitely an option. They have an interesting decentralization approach but idk if they have quantum resistant e2ee yet.