this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
252 points (90.6% liked)

science

14791 readers
393 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts say even if it claims to be “microwave-safe.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's the study in question. Can't speak to the authenticity of it but off the top I don't see anything shady

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn't look shady, but I can only access the abstract which just says "plastics" and doesn't specify that part further, unfortunately.

[–] valaramech@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me, it has a picture where it specifies a "polypropylene container".

There's also this bit from near the end of the abstract:

Additionally, the polyethylene-based food pouch released more particles than polypropylene-based plastic containers. Exposure modeling results suggested that the highest estimated daily intake was 20.3 ng/kg·day for infants drinking microwaved water and 22.1 ng/kg·day for toddlers consuming microwaved dairy products from polypropylene containers.

So, they're, at least, discussing polypropylene and polyethylene.

[–] ArcticDagger@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the method section of the paper:

Materials and Property Characterization. From a popular US chain store, two brands of baby food containers made of polypropylene and one brand of reusable food pouch with- out material information on the label were purchased. The selection of polypropylene containers was based on its widespread use in baby food packaging. These choices aimed to showcase diverse types of baby food packaging. The food containers and the food pouch were analyzed for their semicrystalline structure and thermal stability by DSC using a Q200 differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE). Briefly, a small sample weighing between 3 and 8 mg was taken from each container or pouch, placed in a DSC aluminum pan/lid assem- bly, and crimped with a press. The samples were heated and cooled at a rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere, resulting in calori- metric curves that indicate the heat transfer to and from the polymer sample during the thermal cycle, which was used to monitor phase transitions. H u s s a i n e t a l . i n E n v i r o n . S c i . T e c h n o l . 5 7 ( 2 0 2 3 ) 5 Transmission wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) of the reusable food pouch was performed at the 12-ID-B beamline at the Advanced Pho- ton Source (Argonne National Laboratory), using incident X-rays with energy 13.30 keV and a Pilatus 300k 2D detector mounted 0.4 m from the sample. WAXD patterns of the two plastic containers were acquired in reflection geometry with a Bruker-AXS D8 Discover equipped with a Cu Kα lab source (λ = 1.5406 A) and a Vantec 500 area detector. In all cases, the acquired 2D patterns were radially averaged to produce 1D intensity (I) vs scattering vector (q) plots

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

two brands of baby food containers made of polypropylene and one brand of reusable food pouch

These choices aimed to showcase diverse types of baby food packaging

3 brands, two of the same overall declared material, and no reference to manufacturer formulation safety data. If this is an American paper, the FDA requires substances that come into contact with food to be vetted, so the information should exist somewhere if these are legally sold. Which is obviously not guaranteed. This is not giving me much hope for this study.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

One of the biggest travesties today is that so many scientific studies are locked behind pay walls.